Maybe it's time to put the test to the test.



Testing is a big part of a teachers job - it's how we keep track of student learning, it's how we report to parents on progress, it's how we report on national standards. My question is, how much testing is too much? And why do we test?

The way I see it, there are two forms of testing: Testing for learning, and learning for testing. 


Learning for testing is where tests are completed in order to see what stage students are at so that we can report on it. This is where the ultimate goal for the student is to learn so they can get a better score on the test next time. This is where tests are running the students' school life and the idea of a successful student, is how well they do on tests.


Testing for learning is where specific tests are completed in order to give the teacher a better view on what stage the student is at, and where the student needs to go next. I have seen teachers use PAT, STAR and Running records (to name a few) in this way. Classrooms who are run in this way can cut back on a whole lot of tests just by asking "What useful information am I going to get out of this test?" "Is this test going to give me information I can use for students' next steps?" Teaching this way takes a lot more work and time because you are not just looking at the final score, but are analysing the test to see where the student went wrong and the big concepts that the student is missing. 


We need to be asking ourselves what the point of tests are. Why are we doing them? What are we, and the students, getting out of them? 

If teachers are testing students, taking the grade and marking it down as an achievement, and never looking at the test again then we are missing a great opportunity to delve deeper, to really get to know our students, to analyse where they are, and what they understand. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge

What I did today...

Pity the Plight of Young Fellows...