Are we killing creativity in our learners?

-
I spent time in a new entrant class recently. I gave them a photo of a head, and a blank piece of paper and told them to finish the picture. I told them to be creative, I wanted to see the most wacky, out there picture I'd ever seen. I wrote down some of their stories...


This is a sheep in the city in Africa, and this thing is oxygen that is going into his body. 

A bear got bitten by a lizard and now he is half bear, half lizard. Everyone thinks he's a monster but he's actually friendly.

The bird ate a bug and grew some horns and squids legs. 

This is a horse, and when it stands on grass it's body changes colour into a rainbow. 

The bird eats a flower, then he found out it was poisonous. It came out his bum and went on a bee. The bee put it into a flower and it went up into the sky and the whole world became poisonous. 


These young learners are so creative, and so full of ingenuity. What if we could somehow keep hold of this creative side until we were old enough and knowledgeable enough to do something great with it. The few of us that keep a slim grasp on it through our education system become our greatest musicians, or greatest artists, or greatest dancers. 

Sir Ken Robinson discusses creativity in depth in his famous Ted Talk, and talks about killing creativity in our schools, and silo-ing students. Making them sit still, keep quiet and find the 'right' answer (but don't copy anyone else). 


How can we keep this creativity? What does the education system as a whole need to change to keep it? 

What if schools reported on creativity alongside reading, writing and maths? Could this move alone allow schools turn creativity into a valued skill in our young people? This is something that schools could do. Just because we have to report on National Standards, doesn't mean we can't report on anything else. 

Comments

  1. Anonymous14 August 2015 at 16:31

    "if we force kids to learn things they're not interested in for 7-8 years, after a while you tend to extinguish that natural ability to learn" Sir Ken Robinson. I agree the most important thing we can do as teachers and parents is to protect creativity. Creativity motivates us to learn to ask questions, to flow. And if at any age we are 'forced' to learn anything derived from meaning to us,it in fact kills our want to learn. And without that we become robots unable to think for ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown23 August 2015 at 19:36

    Cool activity! I just did this with my 5 year old and he loved it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jono Broom24 August 2015 at 18:59

      Awesome! It's heaps of fun for the adult too I found. A great experiment in creativity.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What I did today...

-
Image
Today I went into a classroom as a reliever and ran my own programme. It was with year 7 & 8 students and I set them up to do a one day project. I said to them that today was going to be a little different than their normal school day. They could pick one topic to research, and they could do it all day. Step 1: We completed a brainstorm on our topic answering three questions: What do you already know about your topic?  What would you like to know about your topic?  How is you, finding out this information going to help you, or someone else?  The students came up with some great topics, some decided to focus on helping elephants, some helping endangered turtles, some decided to improve their drawing skills, and others made a vortex air cannon. They were really keen to get stuck straight into finding out more about their topics as soon as they had brainstormed but I made them move on to step 2.  Step 2: Make a plan. We used this sheet, which is one that we developed at m
Read more

The Learning Trap

-
Image
Learning. Many educators see it as something we need to stuff into learners. As some information that the learner is a vessel to be filled with. Many look at teachers as the shovers of stuff into the vessel, or the crafters of learning to hit the most targets at once.  I don't.  I look at learning as something that students need to love. That students will love if just the right combination of environmental elements are met.  If the environmental elements are just right for learning to occur, then it will happen in a much more meaningful and fun way than if it is poured into someone.  Teachers are the creators of the environment. Their purpose in school is to create the traps of learning that students will fall into. Take an example we discussed today as a group. A toy baby is left lying around almost haphazardly in a junior classroom with a towel, and a bowl of water. Play will inevitably lead students towards a discussion of bathing a baby. This is the environmenta
Read more

A Utopian "What if?"

-
I've been reading Peter Gray's book Free to Learn recently, which has made me reflect widely on my last 6 years in the education profession. I have thought about the different schools that I have taught at, and the different experiences and challenges that have lead me to where I am now. Peter gray offers a fresh perspective on school. I'm going to start this blogpost with some quotes from his book.  "[One of the sins of education is] Judging students in ways that foster shame, hubris, cynicism, and cheating. It is not easy to force people to do what they do not want to do."   "We rely now primarily on a system of incessant testing, grading, and ranking of children to motivate them to do their schoolwork."  The system itself has fostered what it has been fighting so long to weed out. The system itself has created a culture of shaming students, ranking students, and making learning a chore. "By the time they are eleven or twelve year
Read more